Wednesday, December 27, 2023

My Random Thoughts on my “Random Thoughts” 2023.


The month of January gets its name from the Roman god Janus who was the god of beginnings, gates and transitions and obviously apropos for the 1st month of the year.[i]   Often Janus is depicted as having two faces with one looking forward and another looking backwards.

There are plenty of forward and backward moments in January that might please the god Janus if the god Janus existed.   We look forward to receiving our W-2’s from our jobs that reveal how much we made in the previous year that we have to report to the IRS by April 15th.   By the time January rolls around most Hollywood pundits are pondering which actors/writers/directors/sound mixers will be nominated and perhaps win that coveted Oscar (ceremony to be held on March 24, 2024) for their performances in 2023.  We realize we eventually have to take down all of the Christmas decorations we put up in 2023 which if you recall was my 1st blogpost published January 9th, 2023.  (to sum up you have anytime between December 26th and the descent of Christ at his 2nd coming) and maybe look forward to when we can put them up again in 2024. 

However, the need to look backward as well as forward I would say primarily takes place during the eight days between Christmas and New Year’s.  News organizations like Time magazine often sum up the year in review in addition to their naming of the Person of the Year[ii].  For 2023 it was Taylor Swift probably because she was that ubiquitous during 2023 and yet, somehow, we weren’t complaining about her ubiquity.  Plenty of YouTubers also have their best/worst lists of the year out as well. 

 But most importantly for me it has now been a year since I’ve started this blog so I thought I’d might reread several of them to realize what I have learned about my “Random Thought” in 2023. 

And this is what I have learned.

.1.      I have to work on getting my blogposts out in a timelier manner.

 My blogpost where I tried to get myself cancelled because of my LGBTQ+ views should have been published at the beginning of June not at the end.    By June 30th most people especially in the LGBTQ+ community were probably over the whole rainbow pride celebrations and didn’t want to think about Pride month any longer.   I also should have published my open letter to Prince Harry and Princess Megan sometime in January 2023 when Prince Harry was promoting his “Spare” autobiography instead of June when even most devout royalists were shrugging and going “So what who cares” about whatever problems Prince Harry and Princess Megan were having with the tabloid press and palace courtiers.  And if I had charged ahead and make sure my “Give Peace a Chance” post came out on October 17th instead of December 11th maybe world peace would have broken out by now and many of the 20,000 Palestinians and a few thousand Israeli’s would be alive instead of dead.[iii]     Then again my husband has just accused me of being that arrogant to assume me singing “Give Peace a Chance” would be all it took to end that war in the middle east even if it did get published by October 17th.   I realize that in order for me to be timely I may need to work on my blogposts weeks if not months in advance.   For example, my most recent blogpost published December 18th, 2023, explaining why “The Toy Story that Time Forgot” was the one Christmas special that best exemplified the true meaning of Christmas I began in July and rewrote after spending time with family on Thanksgiving.

 2.      I need an editor. 

I published four blogposts between August 26th and September 5th going on about how I was OK with the end of the Hollywood world as we know it and why I felt fine.   In hindsight I realize the paragraphs upon paragraphs I published could be summed up in the following single paragraph statement-

Hollywood movie studios need to pay their writers and actors more because the general TV viewing and movie-going public is no longer going to spend their hard-earned time and harder to come by money on mindless drecky entertainment.   Ironically this may mean that fewer movies and TV shows will be made because society at large isn’t giving the Hollywood movie moguls the money they want/need like in the past.  However, with over 100+ years of movies to explore and over 70+ years of television shows to watch Hollywood could cease to exist and we will still find plenty of stuff to entertain us on the various streaming platforms that are out there that ironically probably helped to kill the Hollywood entertainment model to begin with.   Besides, I’m more likely to stream something on YouTube for free from an amateur to semi-professional content creator than stream something from a streaming service owned by the movie studios or a dot.com movie company.

I’m also worried my verbosity may have hindered rather than helped Dallas Jenkins get his $160 million to continue his work on “The Chosen” series.    Maybe me going on and on why Jenkins’ crowdfunding may be drying up and why he still needs lots of money wasn’t the way to go.  Maybe I should have gone on and on about how there a plenty of wonderful jokey moments that are in good taste like in season one episode two when Jesus is sitting down with Mary Magdalene and her friends at Shabbat dinner when Mary Magdalene's friend Barnaby remarks something (or really someone) good can come from a po-dunk town like Nazareth was back in biblical times.  Jesus smiled at Barnaby in agreement instead of scowling at him all wrath-of-God-y.    Maybe talking about 14-minute single take shot of an extremely long line of sick people waiting for Jesus to heal them while the camera followed various apostles dealing with this situation from episode three season two was not the way to go. The general viewing public probably doesn’t understand how technically hard that shot was and how multiple things needed to go right to be perfect.  Maybe I should have gone on and on about the wonderful performances Shahar Isaac and Lara Silva gave as Simon Peter and Simon Peter’s wife Eden especially during the season three story arc where Eden miscarries their child while Simon Peter is away preaching the Gospel (And Eden doesn’t tell Simon Peter about it at first) creating tension between the two of them and eventually between Simon Peter and Jesus.  The whole show makes a point that all of the apostles Jesus surrounded himself while He was here on earth were flawed and fully actualized human beings instead of some lofty marble statues Catholics allegedly worship.    So yes, that show is wonderful with plenty of great dramatic moments.   And that is the point I should have made so the money can come Dallas Jenkins’ way.

By the way it's not too late to donate to Come and See  foundation if you want a tax write off for 2023.   (Or maybe you actually have watched the show and want to make sure Dallas Jenkins gets the $160 million needed for the rest of the show's run).   

3.        3.      I am wondering if I should even be a blogger.

I began the blog because I wanted to get back to writing.   I always wanted to be a writer, and this was my way of getting back to that dream.  I want to take a moment to publicly thank my husband for all of his ongoing support like giving me a how-to blogpost tip book this past Christmas and for giving me time and space to work on this on my own.  

However, just because I want to be a writer and have been writing this blogpost for over a year now doesn’t mean that I should be a writer.

I personally think my blogpost on everyone having Thanksgiving off is the best one I’ve published to date.  However, just because I think it’s great doesn’t mean that it is actually great.    I don’t want to be like a 2000’s "American Idol" contestant going before the judges believing they’re the next Kelly Clarkson only to have Simon Cowell emphatically state a garbage disposal griding metal nuts and bolts to smithereens is more melodious than that tone deaf caterwauling Idol contestant.   I want to know if I am actually good at writing these blogposts.

I haven’t received much in the way of feedback as to whether or not what I'd written was good.   I haven’t also received feedback that what I'd written was awful either. I often wonder if anyone is taking the time to read my blogposts and if not why not?    Am I that boring?  Is my writing style still stuck in the arrested development age of my 13-year-old moody snarky self who began to write?   Is my grammar and borderline run on sentences too much of a turn off in the age of Tik Tok and pithy Facebook memes?    My writing can be very cathartic for me as I try and focus on something other than that customer that screamed at how badly I suck as a human being during my day job.   However, catharsis was created by the Greeks in conjunction with the invention of the play where someone like Sophocles probably wanted the audience to gouge their eyes out at the same time Oedipus learned the truth about his marriage to his wife Jocasta.     Catharsis shouldn’t be an act one does alone.

A writer wants an audience to share their thoughts with.   I could easily just keep a private journal and write my self-loathing thoughts of how I’m a lousy Catholic especially in Lent (My most active time with 10 & ¼ blogs written about it) because I do a lousy job fasting, praying and almsgiving and because of this I’m going to Hell because I love being selfish and self-centered instead of loving Jesus/God/Others.   But, there is part of me that was hoping that maybe me going on and on about how Elvis is likely to be playing in my brain while praying the rosary instead of some biblically appropriate Gregorian chant will make you smile and maybe give you some schadenfreude about how you are better than me.

So, lastly.  Please I really need to know what your random thoughts on my “Random Thoughts”.        What do you think?    

Monday, December 18, 2023

And the one Christmas special that represents the true meaning of Christmas is…..

 

It is the time of year for tons of yuletide traditions: Sending Christmas cards to our friends and family far away-that has been happening since 1843.  The decorating of the Christmas tree-we have been doing since sometime around the 16th century.  The singing Christmas carols (1st one “Jesus Illuminates All”, 336 A.D), and kicking back and watching a bunch of Christmas specials/movies.

Over the Thanksgiving holiday I had an interesting discussion of what constitutes a Christmas movie or special.   For example, some would argue that the movie “Die Hard” is a Christmas movie.  It does, after all, take place on Christmas Eve with John McClane coming to L.A. to see his kids and perhaps fix the relationship with his soon-to-be ex-wife Holly.  It begins with the limo driver playing Run DMC “Christmas in Hollis” while taking John to his wife’s office where they are having a huge Christmas party.   The film, however, quickly devolves from that point into a stereotypical action movie that was popular in the 1980’s with Bruce Willis trying to give Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger a run for their box office money.   Is it a good movie?  Yes, it is a good action movie. But it isn’t the 1st movie that comes to mind when I think of a Christmas movie.

“Die Hard” I would dub as a Fil -in -the -Blank genre movie that has a Christmas label stuck on it. If you want to call “Die Hard” a Christmas movie you can but it has very little to do with Christmas and certainly doesn’t reflect the true meaning of Christmas.   The movie “Gremlins” could also be called a Christmas movie. In reality, though, “Gremlins” is a PG-13 horror film with those little green monsters terrorizing the town of Kingston Falls at Christmas.  I would also classify most of the Hallmark Channel’s lineups under this category as well with them rehashing the same romantic comedy tropes against a Christmas backdrop.   Heck I would even throw such notable classic Christmas movies as the Bing Crosby Rosemary Clooney musical “White Christmas” in the Fill in the blank genre movie with Christmas label stuck to it category because it’s more of a musical spectacular than it is about the Christmas holiday.

Then there are the movies and specials that clearly are about Christmas because they feature the ultimate icon of Christmas-Santa Claus. Now Santa doesn’t have to be even the main character or have the movie or special revolve entirely around Santa for it to qualify as a Santa film.   The movie “Elf” is about an orphaned baby boy named Buddy who was raised by elves trying to find his human birth parents and Santa is only tangentially connected to it.   The most famous Rankin Bass stop motion Christmas special was all about Santa suddenly needing reindeer with a built-in spotlight hence Rudolph’s becoming an insider rather than an outsider of the Christmas world.   A Santa movie is a wonderful thing at Christmas because as famous editor of the New York Sun posted to young 8 year old Virginia when she asked if Santa was real  “(Santa) exists as certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist, and you know that they abound and give to your life its highest beauty and joy.” [i]   And I would say most Santa films embody that feeling of love and generosity that abound during the Christmas season.

But there are certainly other notable Christmas classics that aren’t just some other type of movie with a Christmas label attached to it or something that takes place within the greater Santa Claus cinematic multiverse.  Those I would say embody that spirit of Christmas but not quite the true meaning of Christmas. They capture that feeling of love, generosity and joy so much they become obvious Christmas classics.  The movie “It’s A Wonderful Life” is really a 140 minute pre-“The Twilight Zone” episode done in the Frank Capra heartfelt patriotic style.   But somehow “It’s a Wonderful Life” is more than some weird sci-fi mystical plot about an angel showing how the world is worse off without George Bailey in it.   Because it has that heart and spirit of generosity people love this film and it fits Christmas’ overall theme.  The 1966 Chuck Jones TV adaptation of his fellow cartoonist buddy’s Dr. Seuss book “How the Grinch Stole Christmas” could be classified as a Santa film with the Grinch being an anti-Claus who steals things rather than gives them.  In the end though, the Grinch realizes that Christmas isn’t material it’s spiritual and the joy he receives causes him to repent of his Grinchy ways so he too can spread the Christmas love.   Charles Dickens “A Christmas Carol” is by Dickens’ own words a ghost story. Yet, the theme that Scrooge must care more for humanity than his personal wealth is the epitome of that Christmas spirit of generosity and love and how if we recognize it we can change.   Then there is that brilliant “A Charlie Brown Christmas”.   The one thing that the networks hated about the Peanuts Christmas special was Linus getting up and reciting Luke 2:Vrs 1-14. Charles Schulz insisted that that biblical passage be in there because “That’s really what Christmas is all about Charlie Brown.”    And maybe why this particular secular special has been so beloved for almost 60 years is because this secular show does a good job recognizing the true meaning of Christmas.  I found a comment online pointing out when Linus is reciting the Gospel of Luke he drops his security blanket when he says “Fear not!”   As soon as the actual Gospel of Christmas is said out loud suddenly Charlie Brown is happier and the Peanuts gang, who have been very nasty to him through much of the special, go out of their way to be nice to him. 

So, does that mean that the only true Christmas specials are the ones who re-present or explore the world of the Nativity of Jesus?  There aren’t too many depictions of Jesus’ birth that makes it into our regular viewing habits for some reason.  Some are better than others.   For example, I prefer to watch the Rankin Bass “Little Drummer Boy” about how a boy filled with hate gets overcome by love as he plays a drum solo for baby Jesus to the other Rankin Bass Nativity themed special “Nestor: The Long -Eared Christmas Donkey” which was just a rehashing of the Rudolph plot with Nestor saving Mary, Joseph and Baby Jesus on their way to Bethlehem.   Dallas Jenkins’ “The Shepherd” was so good it lead to the #1 crowdfunded project of all time “The Chosen”.  I think what made it good is that it realistically depicted how frightening it would be if an army of angels suddenly appeared in the sky in addition to making a protagonist that was put upon and derided by everyone around him because he was a cripple. (Making his healing and being the 1st one to hold baby Jesus after Mary & Joseph all the sweeter).  Yet, these Nativity specials, while showing the reason for the season, don’t necessarily get to the heart of why the Son of God had to become incarnate in human flesh to begin with.    

So, allow me to explain the Christmas movie/special has more to do with the true meaning of Christmas than most TV specials.  It’s Pixar’s “The Toy Story that Time Forgot” which came out around Christmas 2014 and aired on Disney owned ABC. [ii]  The special itself is at first glance only nominally Christmas-y.   The story takes place about two days after Christmas which makes sense since the only times a year a kid gets a lot of new toys is either on their birthday or on Jesus’ birthday.   The plot features Bonnie packing up Buzz, Woody, Rex, Trixie, and a stuffed kitty angel ornament that’s been hanging on Bonnie’s tree for a playdate with her friend Mason at his house.  Now prior to Bonnie dragging her toys to her friend Mason’s home the show opens up with Trixie the plastic triceratops lamenting how Bonnie is never allowing her to be the big blue plastic dinosaur she is in the Pixar universe.   Once Bonnie arrives with backpack & toys in tow to Mason’s home Mason quickly urges Bonnie to play with him on his new videogame console in his game room.   Bonnie quickly throws her backpack into Mason’s playroom where the Toy Story toys quickly realize Santa was very good to Mason because Santa gave him a vast collection of these half human/half dinosaur action figures and matching playsets.  Trixie quickly befriends one of the half human/half dino action figures named Reptillus and they develop a borderline romance.  Of course, per Toy Story logic most action figures do not know they are toys and begin to act out their commercial alter egos for better towards Trixie and fellow plastic dino Rex, and for worse towards Buzz and Woody who find themselves in the center of a sci-fi dino dystopian colosseum fighting for their lives!   The humanoid dino creatures are at one point about to send Buzz, Woody, and the kitty angel ornament to their deaths down a heating vent shaft (with the kitty angel playing “O Come O Come Emanuel” on her decorative trumpet) when Trixie manages to make her way into the game room (unseen of course because also by Toy Story rules no toy can be seen as alive) to shut off the power to Mason’s game console, thereby forcing Mason & Bonnie to play with the physical toys and not the virtual ones.  Before she gets there her new Dino boyfriend Reptillus tries to stop her. Trixie then convinces Reptillus he is more than just some plastic warrior.  By accepting the fact he is a toy and surrendering to something/someone greater than himself he can go beyond what he had ever imagined.   I think Reptillus ultimately shuts the power off and allows himself to be held by Mason and let Mason determine his actions.   Afterwards Reptillius described the feeling of being a plaything in Mason’s hands, not knowing anything about the outcome or what he was supposed to be as a glorious experience.

Now, you ask, why did God send his only begotten Son to be our Lord and savior.  It’s because in some ways like Mason’s toys we too are trapped in a tiny ego world of our own making and we often make a mess of it.  Sometimes we too need to surrender to our higher power a.k.a. God and let him dictate our ways.  Because it we do, we too can experience something glorious.  And once we do, we too can then spread that glory of God’s love and devotion to the rest of the world.  



[i] Frank B. Church, Editor of the New York Sun, 1897

Monday, December 11, 2023

I’m being haunted by John Lennon.

 

At this time of year John Lennon’s “Happy Christmas: War is Over” is played over and over again on Christmas radio stations and stores music systems.  That song gets under my skin every time I hear it with its opening lyrics.

“So this is Christmas, and what have you done

Another year over

And a new one just begun.”

Next thing you know Yoko Ono and the Harlem Children’s choir pleads how war is over if you want it while Lennon almost sarcastically begins to wish everyone a Merry Christmas knowing of all of the conflict that was/still is going on in the world that makes it a lousy Christmas for a lot of people.  I always feel a little guilty when I hear the Lennon version of the song because this one is a taunt on my soul.  It reminds me that I’ve done a lousy job trying to make the world a better place from the previous year and especially this year since I had an idea that might bring about world peace. 

Unfortunately, I sat on it and never published it. 

However, before I go into how my idea may have brought about world peace allow me to talk about a show on the Curiosity Streaming network called “Connections with James Burke.”  James Burke connects two random things such as the potato to an unlimited source of green energy in the future.  (and no, James Burke was not advocating everyone plug their Alexa devices into a potato ala potato clock from your grammar school science class.) The connections are as follows: the Incas cultivated the potato to feed their growing empire. Spanish conquistadors took the potato to Europe where eventually Queen Marie Antoinette tried to end hunger in France by encouraging people to grow it and eat it. Contrary to the myth of her being an insensitive 1% er Marie Antoinette gave frequently to charity and also successfully managed to get a divorce (a rather impossible thing especially in a heavy Catholic country like France was at the time of the French Revolution) for badly battered Princess Louise de Stolberg from husband Bonnie Prince Charlie of Scotland.  At the time of the divorce Bonnie Prince Charlie was a raging alcoholic in exile in Rome alongside other Jacobites after he lost his attempt to take over the British throne.  Then fellow Jacobite exile James Byers would discover in Rome an ancient blue and white vase that would in turn inspire Josiah Wedgewood to come up with his famous patterns.  The head of Wedgewood’s European division William Nicholson dissected an electric ray where he discovers a group of flat gelatinous cells that he surmises is the organ that produces the ray’s electrical shock.  Nicholson’s electric ray’s anatomical drawings inspire Alessadro Volta to create the world 1st battery.   Then an Italian professor named Romangnosi discovers a compass needle goes haywire when he waves a battery in front of it meaning electricity can be found in the air.  Professor Dr. Carl Ludwig Barron von Reichenbach expands upon Romangnosi to discover an electrical substance called od that most scientists view as complete hokum. However, Reichenbach also discovered a substance in coal tar named Naptha that Charles Mackintosh used to liquidize rubber to be applied to the first raincoat.  Then Mackintosh needed the help of rubber expert Thomas Hancock to make enough liquid rubber to keep up with the raincoat demand.   Meanwhile Thomas Hancock’s brother Charles was mashing up other rubbers to create the rubber shielding around the transatlantic telegraph cable.    The chief engineer for the company laying down the transatlantic cable Wiloughby Smith notices when light hits the selenium he is using to test the cable it also gives off electricity thereby discovering the first photoelectric substance.   Then a German minerologist discovers another photoelectric substance he dubs perovskite after fellow minerologist Lev Perovski.   And perovskite may be what we spray on solar cells to give us energy in the future.

I was always amazed at the way Burke could connect these wild and random dots to reveal something incredible.  And the reason why I bring this up is because awhile back I wrote about how a series of seemingly random events connected in my brain for what I thought would be the greatest idea ever.  Except I never published it.  And yes, it has a definite connection to John Lennon. 

So, back to why I think I’m being haunted by John Lennon and my series of connections that happened in my brain that I sat on.

The original blogpost I never published was titled “Thank you Random Universe for giving me inspiration for perhaps my Ultimate Radom thought.  Give Peace a Chance” .  I meant it to be published on or shortly after the date of October 17th, 2023.  I began to go on about how I failed to fast on October 17th, 2023.  Pope Francis’ commanded every Catholic to fast on that day to try to bring about peace in the Middle East.  This latest Papal command to fast was brought about by the latest attack by Hamas when they dropped into that Israeli Lollapalooza concert on October 7th, 2023, and began to kill hundreds of people taking several more hostage.  This naturally brought about a response from Israel with Israel probably killing more Palestinians than Hamas has killed of Israelis at this point.  I really didn’t want to ponder that day what seems like a hopeless never ending tragic conflict.   So, instead on that October 17th, 2023, I ended up watching the latest “Tasting History with Max Miller” on YouTube to try to get my mind off of the horror.    Max Miller’s “Tasting History” reminds me a bit of Alton Brown “Good Eats” tv show back when the Food Network showed you how to cook food instead of having foodie themed game shows where average cooks compete to figure out how to best combine Brussel sprouts with Kellogg’s Pop Tarts in a way that is pleasing to the pallet of your average preschooler and a panel of James Beard award winning pastry chefs at the same time.  The “Tasting History” episode that premiered on YouTube on October 17th, 2023, featured the history of Vienna’s famous Sacher torte.  The one weird random factoid Miller mentioned in the video was how the Sacher torte was offered as a lure to get John Lennon & Yoko Ono out of the bag they were staying in inside hotel Sacher in Vienna. 

This in turn reminded me of the various bed-in’s Lennon had for peace during the Vietnam war and how during one of those bed-ins he wrote the ultimate ode to peace “Give Peace a chance”.   After reviewing the lyrics, I realized Lennon just decided to string together random words/thoughts.  Then again, it’s amazing that he came up with an amazing and generationally relevant song on the fly like that with a crowd of about 100+ people in a 750 sq ft room after doing whatever Timothy Leary no doubt dropped in his tea with only two guitars and some tambourines.[i]        

It was then I came up with a potential viral video.  The idea is everyone take a moment to record themselves singing just the chorus of John Lennon’s “Give Peace a Chance” and then spread it on social media.  Maybe Yoko Ono wouldn’t object and allow her copyright claims to slide if someone decided to update the lyrics to reflect the current state of conflict in the world but kept Lennon’s simple melody.  John Lennon put into words humanity’s ultimate prayer in a time of intense conflict- Please give peace a chance.  The world wants peace but let’s face it, as long as there are a few hardhearted hate mongers in key positions in the world the chance of peace coming may not work until we cry louder than that hate and rage to just give peace a chance.

Except I never published that blog post.

I think what intimidated me the most was the fact that I would be exposing myself more to the public than perhaps I was emotionally ready for.  So, I let that blogpost sit on my laptop to the point it’s no longer timely making it now irrelevant.   

But maybe it’s not too late.  This is still the season of peace.  This is the time of year when we are to welcome into our hearts the newborn Prince of Peace.  Maybe, if I, like a pebble, put this out into the world wide web it will resound so this Christmas maybe will be better this year.

So here I go.


https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=d796ca36e7&attid=0.1&permmsgid=msg-f:1784779168542506141&th=18c4cf32977e3c9d&view=att&disp=safe 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



[i] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3_0GqPvr4U.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thursday, December 7, 2023

A fan letter to Sir Paul McCartney

 

Once upon I time, I thought of an alternative blog post idea.  I would write celebrities and publish my letters to them online and hopefully their responses as well.    However, I realized there are only two celebrities I wanted to write to.  One was the late G.O.A.T comedian Robin Williams to see what he thought of the entire astronomical society agreeing with Mork from Ork’s assessment that Pluto was indeed “a Mickey Mouse planet” when they downgraded Pluto from solar system world you had to include in your mnemonic phrases to a Kuiper Belt dwarf planet-esque object.  The other I am hoping to still reach is the legendary pop rock star Sir Paul McCartney. 

Now, I know there are some still out there who may be wondering who Sir Paul McCartney is although I’m glad Kayne West could introduce him to Gen Z (like Paul McCartney needs it?).[i]   But for those of you who have never ever ever ever ever ever ever head of a band called “The Beatles” in the past 60 years (maybe you were raised on some isolated mountaintop with no radio or TV whatsoever?)   Paul McCartney was one of the “Fab 4”.  The Beatles really meant it when the told Beethoven to roll over and tell Tchaikovsky the news that The Beatles were the ones everyone was going to listen to 200 years from now especially after The Beatles began to blend those symphonic orchestrations into rock’n’roll music along with those great American blues backbeat rhythms.        

My fan letter would begin as all letters with the greeting-

Dear Sir McCartney,

Then a quick intro paragraph explaining who I am-

“I know I am one of about a billion or more Beatles fans on the planet that have adored you for sixty years or more and it’s rare for me to find anyone who actively dislikes “The Beatles” .

OK for the record I know my husband does not like the Beatles but let’s just say we agree to disagree about the awesomeness of the Beatles.

  “I myself was born two years after The Beatles broke up but I discovered your music through an old Beatles Saturday morning cartoon[ii] that reran on my local UHF station I watched while growing up.  I know at the time it was made you were too busy touring the world to provide your voice to your cartoony avatar.  Yet I was grateful the show did have the wisdom to make sure the cartoony Fab Four were lip synched to the music being produced by the actual Fab Four since, in hindsight, that was probably the best part of the entire cartoon. If you have never watched it, think of it as ‘A Hard Day’s Night’ but for children with the same premise playing out for 39 episodes.  The music was infectious, fun, delightful and influenced my taste in music to the point when I got older, I never could get into the teen boy bands my friends were into in the 1980’s (Menudo, New Kids on the Block) because all of them seemed like pale imitators of the original boy band which you were a part of.   Sure, they were cute but talentless hacks compared to yours and John’s musical genius.       

And then I go on to argue why the latest and last Beatles song, (just released on November 2nd, 2023), is the greatest Beatles song of all time.

Wait, the Beatles have a new song?

Yes, back in 1994[iii] when John Lennon was being inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame as a solo artist his widow Yoko Ono gave Paul McCartney these cassette tapes that had songs from John he recorded prior to his tragic death on December 8th, 1980.  Paul, in turn, got the Beatles back together to turn these cassette recordings into new Beatles songs.  The first one “Free as a Bird” released on the Beatles’ Anthology album in 1995 was kind of meh, mumbly and just OK; but not the kind of song that would upend the Beatles legacy.  The next song “Real Love” released on the Beatles Anthology 2 album in 1996 was slightly better but not necessarily earth shattering.      The last song Yoko gave Paul of John “Now and Then” was supposed to come out on the Beatles Anthology 3 album but there was a problem.   The piano John used to play the song with as he was composing it was louder than John’s voice.   Back in the 1990’s there was no way to get John’s voice to be louder than his piano banging.   With John no longer alive to re-record the song Paul just had to put the recording on a shelf. 

Until filmmaker Peter Jackson, director of the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy decided to turn the Beatles final film-The documentary “Let it Be” that chronicled the band’s tension and why they were breaking up, into a miniseries for Disney +  called “Get Back”.    Now anyone who has parodied the Beatles over the years (other than going with the mop-top haircut) knows the band members are famous for their Liverpudlian accents that is more mumble than refined Shakespearian queen’s (or should I say king’s) English.  So, like any good documentarian the filmmakers who filmed The Beatles in 1968-69 attempting to make a new Beatles album had hundreds of hours of film left on the cutting room floor probably because no one could understand what John, Paul, George and Ringo were saying to each other.   Peter Jackson developed new technology to get those conversations to be crips and clear and Paul asked if Peter Jackson could use the technology to try and bring John’s voice to life from the cassette tape Yoko had given him.  And if worked!     

“I have been a Beatles fan all my life and I want to thank you for releasing “Now and Then” to the world.   “Now and Then” I would have to say is the greatest Beatle song of all time and that I know is saying a lot.  You released the song on November 2nd, 2023.  November 2nd is as you may or may recall from your Catholic school upbringing is the feast of All Souls Day where Catholics especially remember those who have departed from us in this lifetime and may be residing in Purgatory.  And, as soon as I heard John’s opening lyrics of -

‘I know it’s true,

It’s all because of you,

And if I make it through

It’s all because of you.’ 

I began to envision John singing this song from Purgatory.”

For those readers of mine who aren’t Catholic or are Catholic but whose local church has de-emphasized the teaching of Purgatory, Purgatory is a place where souls go to atone for the sins they couldn’t quite atone for while they were alive.  Yes, God forgives sins hence us getting into Heaven because of the sacrament of Baptism which takes away sins.   The sacrament of Reconciliation also takes away those sins, but you still have to make up for the sins in some way.    Think of it this way.   A group of kids begin to play a pickup baseball game in the middle of a cul-de-sac because the kids’ individual yards are too small to have a baseball diamond.    One kid smacks a home run right through a neighbor’s closed window breaking it.   The owner of the home with the broken window can easily forgive the kids because they recognize they are kids not adults and the kids don’t know any better.  While the owner of the broken window understands these things happen, there is still the matter of how to mend the broken window which means maybe the future Babe Ruth may have to give part or all their weekly allowance to the homeowner until the window repairs are paid for.   This is where Purgatory comes in because Catholics believe those, we have wronged in this world we need to make it up to even if it means suffering for awhile in the next.  

So, as I explained to Sir Paul, John Lennon was good enough of a man (and probably baptized as a baby) to make it into Heaven.  However, considering John Lennon’s #1 hit “Imagine” denies the reality of the Heavenly hereafter and encourages others to do so, he somehow or other has to make it up to the entire Heavenly hosts hence time in Purgatory. And because John may have been singing in Purgatory, I began to explain why this particular Beatles song is so relevant now.

“Moreover, I think there are a lot more of us thinking about those we may have lost recently.  This song brings beautiful bittersweet tears of joy as we remember them.  The Covid pandemic has taken nearly 7 million lives thus far[iv] globally and with new wars going on taking more lives and an increase in violence worldwide, many of us are experiencing the loss of a loved one at this time.  Even if someone is lucky enough to have all your loved ones still, there’s an ongoing loss of the world we once knew pre-pandemic.    You might say “Now and Then” was John’s response to your “Yesterday” that had a similar beautiful melancholy tone.    It, like “Yesterday” will become timeless but unlike “Yesterday” you have made it richer and more symphonic sounding than your simple “Yesterday”.   This symphonic orchestration is what elevates it to being the greatest Beatle song of all time.   So, as soon as one does lose someone they love, and does think of them every “Now and Then” they’ll also have this song playing in the back of their minds as well.

I am also hoping that you are getting all the royalty rights from this song.”

 Ah yes for those of you not Beatles fans allow me to give a brief Beatles history lesson.   When the Beatles began to get big in 1963, they sought out a partnership with a music publisher for the rights to their songs.  They formed a partnership with Dick James who owned 50% of all Beatles music with John Lennon & Paul McCartney owning 20% each and original Beatles manager Brian Epstein probably owning 10%.  The Beatles named the business group Northern Songs after the Northern part of England where the band grew up.   In 1965 Northern Songs became a public company with John & Paul owning 15% each and George and Ringo splitting a smaller percentage of royalty rights and Dick James still owning a larger percentage.  In 1969 Dick James ended up selling his portion to ATV music and The Beatles, who were facing massive losses of money with their own record company Apple Corps, ended up losing the rights to their music. [v]    In 1985 ATV music ended up putting the entire Beatles catalogue up for auction.  Michael Jackson, then flushed with cash from the #1 best selling album “Thriller” at the time, decided to enact on this financial investment tip ironically given to him by Sir Paul when they worked together on a pair of songs in the 1980’s and bought the Beatles catalogue outright.   I go on to explain why Michael Jackson realized the Beatles songs would be worth a lot more than his own songs.

“I can understand why Michael Jackson would want to own The Beatles entire music catalog.   Michael Jackson probably knew you were the better songwriter than him and your legacy would outlast his.  If you want to compare the two songs you two did together ‘The Girl is Mine’ and ‘Say Say Say’ of the two the one you wrote was more complex, richer in texture and a true duet.  It was more like a dual-et as ‘Say Say Say’ could be read as a guy trying to act cool and not caring of a girls’ affection on the outside but inside, he dying to know that the girl likes him too.  This is the opposite of Michael’s ‘The Girl is Mine’ which I can tell was just you and Michael taking turns singing the same melody.   I’m not sure how many artists are regularly covering a Michael Jackson song or wanting to sing one out loud.   It’s hard for me to imagine someone other than Michael Jackson singing something like ‘Thriller’ or ‘Billie Jean’.   Meanwhile, everyone sounds good singing one of The Beatles songs and wants to sing them because they are simple and catchy and good.   I remember shortly after “Now and Then” came out YouTube music teacher [vi]  Rick Beato sang the song, and he sounded halfway decent singing it.    Everyone does sound somewhat good singing a Beatles song which is why they continually sing them.   I think it’s because you and John always kept the song in mind 1st and the performance of it 2nd.   I remember you saying you wanted to be a bit like Irving Berlin, Cole Porter, George and Ira Gershwin and Rodgers & Hammerstein that wrote songs but didn’t really sing them themselves.  You were OK with others performing the songs.”

And performed it the world has.   Yes, I am grateful the world has a new Beatles song and I am grateful for the contributions Paul McCartney has given the world musically.   So, it’s about time I wrote him a letter thanking him for all that he has done for the world, and for the joy he has brought me. 

I’ll let you know if I get a response back.