Friday, April 18, 2025

Why I am not a huge fan of "The Passion of the Christ"

 


As far as 21st century biblical media projects it seems like it’s only “The Chosen” TV series and Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of The Christ” from 2004 that has both the religious reverence and cinematic quality of production to make them popular.   Objectively speaking I know “The Passion of The Christ” is an incredible movie masterpiece.   The cinematography is breathtaking.  The acting performances are incredible which they must be in order to communicate the emotions and feeling of the gospel’s pivotal players while speaking a language [i]   approximately 0.002% of the world’s population understands.    I am not going to deny the fact “The Passion of the Christ” is classic and director Mel Gibson is an artistic genius.  

Having said this Gibson uses that gorgeous cinematography and epic film making techniques to glorify the most bloody, gory, vomit inducing depiction of Christ’s passion ever put on the silver screen.     There are plenty of moments of unnecessary violence that didn’t need to be there.    There was the scene where the temple guards nearly hang Jesus on the way to his Sanhedrin trial.   Gibson’s version of Jesus being scourged at the pilar not only have Roman soldiers whip Jesus with the traditional Roman flagrum[ii], but also had them beat the crap out of Jesus with rods as well.    The people of Jerusalem threw rocks and were spitting on Jesus as he made his way to Golgotha carrying a 100 LB cross.  The Romans flipped the cross upside down with Jesus hanging on it so they could bend the nails on the other side of the cross.   Blood was constantly gushing from Jesus’ crown of thorns.   He had a swollen eye.   After re-watching “The Passion of The Christ” for this blog I’m with that YouTuber who referred to the movie as a splatter film.[iii]  The violence of the film was so overwhelming that Mel Gibson almost killed Jim Caviezel in real life! [iv]    (Although I would say the lightning that struck Jim Caviezel was more God’s doing than Gibson’s).   If any Joe Schmo was being tortured this way the movie would have been X-rated, banned from most movie theaters, and blocked by most v-chips instead of embraced to the point where, as “South Park” creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker implied, Evangelical Christians would have no qualms allowing eight-year-olds to see this bloody nightmare of an R rated film.    [v]  Even Gibson himself admitted “Of course it was too much.  But that was the point of it”[vi] where he was trying to focus on the how much suffering Jesus endured for our salvation because, as Gibson added “If it was easy, it wouldn’t be worth much.”

I know some have lobbed the criticism that “The Passion of the Christ” is antisemitic.[vii]   I took the way Gibson depicted the high priests riding on their donkeys in fancy jewel and gold robes more a commentary on elitism of the Sanhedrin rather than on Jewish people in general but perhaps I am naive of antisemitic stereotypes.  In the version I watched the line from the gospel of Matthew which has historically placed the blame of Jesus’ death on the Jewish people[viii][ix] didn’t appear on screen but I heard a rumor it may be there just not translated into English.  [x]    In fact, the second to the last scene of the movie has Maia Morgenstern [xi] who portrayed the Virgin Mary, stare piercingly into the camera as she becomes the center of Gibson’s bloody pieta.  She states without words to look at what we, the sinful human race, did to her son.   Her stare tells us to look at what her son did for us in the sinful human race.   Gibson talked about this being an experience and yes, it is.   I know many people myself feel greatly disturbed after coming away from it.   I guess the idea is after watching it most people are supposed to realize the great wonder Jesus did to save humanity from its sins.  I, however, have a different reaction.   I view Gibson’s gory way of the cross and fear my going to hell by even thinking about eating a piece of chocolate.   I tend to watch “The Passion of the Christ” and give it the same attitude that I gave the awful frozen fish sticks my mom and dad forced me to eat during Lent as a kid, something I had to do but I’m not meant to enjoy.   Watching “The Passion of the Christ” fills me with guilt and remorse and how I’m not good enough for Heaven and maybe…maybe….we’ll let’s just say there are some dark random thoughts I’d rather keep to myself.  

This is what I, a normal Catholic/Christian woman feels who knows who Jesus Christ is and believes in the saving power of the cross.     In many ways I would say “The Passion of the Christ” is a film that appeals to the Christian choir.  I know those basic Christian tenants the way all Christians know but obviously can’t always comprehend the great act of love Jesus did to save the human race.   Keep in mind the word “excruciating”[xii]   origins are in the practice of crucifixion and Gibson’s “Passion” certainly puts that word on the mind of every Christian who watches.

 

But what if a Christian wasn’t watching the film.

 

Here’s another one of my thought experiments.

 

Say, a bunch of Chinese Christians get their hands on a copy of “The Passion of the Christ’ and swap out the English subtitles with Mandarin or Cantonese subtitles depending upon what part of China those Chinese Christians live in.   Being the good Chinese Christians they are they naturally want to evangelize their fellow Chinese citizens, so they decide to show the Mandarin and or Cantonese subtitled “Passion” for free in a local theater with pop and assorted other snacks being sold for a nominal fee.   A Chinese Buddhist walks by, has nothing better to do that evening and what the heck, the movie is free.   Now, maybe that Buddhist has a vague sense of what Christianity is about the way I have a vague sense of what Buddhism is about.  The Chinese Buddhist goes into the theater, sits down, and wonders why this Jesus is so panic stricken in the garden of Gethsemane, what is this weird being that is stalking Jesus, why did he feel the need to kill a snake, what the heck was this man’s crime that a small brigade of soldiers came to arrest him and why didn’t he want his followers to stop them.   Maybe the Chinese Buddhist is asking to himself Is Jesus a magician?   after he watches Jesus restore the ear of the chief of the temple guard[xiii]  that one of Jesus’ followers cruelly sliced off.  The Buddhist then begins to wonder why on earth this Jesus is being tortured in such a cruel way as the movie progresses.   The accusations the Sanhedrin hurl at Jesus, along with additional blows, seem to come out of nowhere and he can’t understand why they would be so mad at Jesus.   The only apparent crime of Jesus is that he claimed to be a king of some kind and that obviously wasn’t true in 33 AD Palestine.  Still, what prompted this massive beating of this guy?  The Chinese Buddhist would then turn to the Chinese Christians in the audience and ask, “What did Jesus do in his life to deserve this?” and the Chinese Christians would answer “Nothing” leaving the Chinese Buddhist to hope that karma comes back at those Roman soldiers’ big time.  That Chinese Buddhist is still probably confused as to why and how Jesus endured what he endured for the human race and wondering if the resurrection was real long after the film ended.

This confusion is perhaps the ironic tragedy of a film like “The Passion of The Christ” as one YouTube critic I found while researching this blog stated, “A non-Christian going to watch this film is going to be as confused as a non-Marvel fan going to watch ‘Endgame’. It’s going to seem like utter nonsense”[xiv] a video whose thumbnail claimed, “The Passion of the Christ made me An Atheist”.     You must know the story of the passion of the Christ (and I’d dare say the Catholic stations of the cross version of the passion of the Christ) to have any kind of emotional connection to the film   Gibson does not have many tender moments in the film to make one empathize with what Jesus was enduring on the screen.   There was a cutesy scene between Jesus and his mother where the Virgin Mary complained about how Jesus was building a too tall table.   There was a sweet scene between Jesus and Saint John with Jesus passing along words of wisdom as he washed Saint John’s feet.  There were a few brief moments from the Sermon of the Mount, a confusing scene involving Jesus saving Mary Magdaline’s life, but nothing really for any non-Christian to latch onto or care about.  Heck that YouTuber wondered if anyone would accept an authentically middle eastern Jesus in cinema.

“The Chosen: The Last Supper”[xv]  coming in #3 at the box office the weekend of April 4-6th behind the “Minecraft” movie proved that YouTuber wrong.   There is so much “The Chosen” gets right about the life and times of Jesus.  “The Chosen” has a predominantly middle eastern looking cast with Jonathan Roumie being ½ middle eastern himself.[xvi] “The Chosen” has the disciples celebrate Jewish feast days like Shabbat, Hanukkah, the feast of booths and Rosh Hashanah.  In episode two of season 5 they explained how everyone had to ditch their pagan money for temple approved non-graven image shekels with an outrageous exchange rate that people needed to buy the animals to be slaughtered for their sins from temple approved animals stalls and other taxes and how everyone had to be ritually 100% purer than an ivory bar of soap from even entering the interior of the temple.  Heck, Jenkins got the portrayal of Mary Magdaline right for once by showing her as a demonically possessed woman in trouble instead of casting her as either the adulterous woman who washed Jesus’ feet in Luke’s gospel [xvii] or the woman caught in the act of adultery from John’s gospel[xviii].   I love how Jenkins celebrates the Jewishness of Jesus and the disciples and has laid out in five seasons why everyone who knew Jesus loved him and why certain people want to kill him.

So, until “The Chosen” season six which features the crucifixion of Jesus, (Or I suppose if I’m desperate I’ll find Jenkins The Two Thieves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io8b9aJiOY0 in which Jenkins takes a “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead”[xix] approach to Jesus’ crucifixion)  I’ll probably force myself as part of my Good Friday penance to endure “The Passion of the Christ” so I can remind myself of the wonders of God’s love for us.

Nah, it’s probably better for me to read the gospel of John’s account of Christ’s passion so I’m not insulting Christ’s passion for us by vomiting out what little food I had on Good Friday by watching Gibson’s the slasher of the Christ movie.



[v] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP6eDXqLY1g  Season 8 episode 3 “The Passion of the Jew”

[viii] Mt 27: 25- “The people said in reply “Let his blood be on us and on our children”.

[xi] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRpoLJhibV8

No comments:

Post a Comment