And the Oscar winner I should be watching is?
If I mention the names Romeo & Juliet-how many people
would know whom I’m talking about? I
would say most of us since most of us have some level of a high school
education including the high school diploma.
Most middle school or high school English teachers probably choose this
play of all of Shakespeare’s plays to introduce young people to the bard of
Stratford on Avon because they’ll assume the average adolescent can easily
relate to a drama of teenagers being madly in love with someone their parents
will absolutely hate. This of course
leads to a wider question- Why is William Shakespeare’s plays even taught in
middle school/high school English classes.
There are other famous playwrights like Sophocles, Moliere, Arthur
Miller, Neil Simon, Tom Stoppard, Ibsen-why the focus on Shakespeare?
Well, besides trying to stretch kids brains with Elizabethan
“Thee”s and “Thou”s and reminding kids of
the 1700 words that got into the English Language thanks to William
Shakespeare’s plays, the reason why most English teachers focus so much on
Shakespeare is because William Shakespeare pretty much invented every
conventional dramatic plot point in existence. A play
told from the villain’s perspective-"Richard III". Battle of the sexes-“Taming of the Shrew”. Revenge plots- “Merchant of Venice”. Stuck in outlandish situations for comedic
affect-“Midsummer’s Night Dream”. Presenting a Jane Austen romantic comedy 200
years before Jane Austen lived-“Much Ado about Nothing”. Crossdressing genderbending-“Twelfth night”. Heck Shakespeare even invented science
fiction-“The Tempest”. Even nowadays playwrights
when they get writer’s block find ways to creatively steal those Shakespearean
plots like when
There are of course numerous other classical books/works of
literature that most English teachers will present to their students as part of
their pedagogy to show common values and themes everyone with a basic high
school diploma should know. The premise
goes we need to keep these stories alive to pass along the life lessons/morals to
the next generation.
This leads into my strange segue into the 95th
annual Oscars presented this past Sunday, March 12th, 2023. I was hoping Stephen Spielberg’s “The
Fabelmans” would have won best picture.
“The Fabelmans” is of course an unofficial autobiography written in the
language Spielberg knows best-cinema.
Spielberg, of course is one of the most recognized film directors of all
time. To date he has directed over 60
projects and produced hundreds of others.
However, when it comes to the Oscars, he only has two for directing. As for Spielberg’s other Oscar Losses, some of
Spielberg’s best known movies- “Raiders
of the Lost Ark”, “Close Encounters of
the Third Kind”, and “E.T.” have all been nominated for best picture and lost
respectively to Warren Beaty’s “Reds” (1982), Woody Allen’s “Annie Hall”,
(1978) and Richard Attenborough’s “Gandhi”
(1983) . Now of those six films
I’ve mentioned I wonder how many people have seen all six and of those which
would you want to see again? Furthermore, forty years from now which ones
of those films will people still want to watch?
I think the answer is obvious
since most people don’t care about the Communist takeover in Russia in 1917 or
have the time to watch a three-hour epic about the life of Mahatma Gandhi or are
ready to cancel Woody Allen because of the incestuous relationship he had with
his teen aged stepdaughter Soon Yi Previn.
There are other films I think Spielberg would recommend people
would watch for forty years from now as well.
In a documentary on Stephen Spielberg he mentioned he always watches the
epic “Lawrence of Arabia” every year since it came out. It’s
been awhile since I’ve seen Lawrence of Arabia, as stated I’m not sure nowadays
if I have three hours to waste on an epic about the life of T.E. Lawrence &
the founding of Saudi Arabia. Still, it did win the best picture Oscar of
1963.
Furthermore, Spielberg’s last movie/Oscar nomination was a
remake of the 1960’s West Side Story.
I’ll admit Spielberg/Tony Kushner provided a much better book/screenplay
than the original movie and at least Spielberg make sure Maria & her
brother Bernardo were played by Hispanic actors instead of white ones in dark
makeup. Yet, the 1960’s movie with Natalie
Wood/Richard Beymer was still a great film on its’ own & won the 1961 best
Oscar. Do audiences no longer care about old movies?
Maybe it’s a numbers game.
There are over 500,000 moves that have been officially made since the
invention of the Edison’s Kinescope camera in 1891. I just
don’t have time to watch all of those films and I feel most people don’t either
especially when you factor in TV shows to binge watch & books to be read & video games
to be played all night as well.
Still, I feel there should be a set of films everyone should
be watching for various reasons. For
example, I thought “The Wizard of Oz” was one of those ubiquitous films
everyone alive since 1939 has watched. I
was shocked when I learned my husband never watched “The Wizard of Oz”. Why? My
husband doesn’t watch black & white films and of course the ‘39 film starts
off with Judy Garland longing musically for a rainbow in sepia toned Kanas. That
film has had such a cultural impact poor Idina Menzel had to wear green pancake
makeup for months when she brought the Wicked Witch of the West to life in the
musical “Wicked” even though author L Frank Baum made no reference to the shade
of the Wicked Witch’s skin color in the original Wizard of Oz book. My
husband’s prejudice against black & white films also means his is missing
out on some the greatest film ever made per the American Film Institute’s top
100 films like “Citizen Kane” considered the greatest film of all time. Prior to 2020 if anyone wanted to be a
filmmaker they would have to study D.W. Griffith’s “Birth of a Nation” because
D.W. Griffith’s movies wrote the book on cinematography. Unfortunately, all of those great camera
techniques on “Birth of a Nation” were used to glorify the start of the K.K.K. and everyone is wondering why D.W. Griffith
wasn’t cancelled out back in 1916.
I’ve quickly reviewed the list of all of the 95 winners for
best picture. How may of us have watched
the 1st Oscar best picture film “Wings?” How may of us have watched last year’s best
picture winner “Coda” or the winning film from 2013 “Twelve Years a Slave” or 50
years ago “The Sting?” . As far as I
can tell “Casablanca”, “The Godfather.”, some of the musicals (“My Fair Lady”, “Sound
of Music”, “An American in Paris”, maybe
even “Chicago”) possibly “Gone with the Wind” (not sure of having the 1st
African American actor-Hattie McDaniel to win an Oscar in 1939 negates the fact
she won that Best Supporting Oscar for playing a southern slave) and “Ben-Hur”
are the only ones that seem to be viewed on a routine basis. Legendary
mystery/horror director Alfred Hitchcock was nominated six time for an Oscar and
lost each time and yet we’re all familiar with the “Psycho” shower scene more so than a lot of other films from 1960. As for other non-Oscar wining films I’d say
most people have seen the Star Wars franchise along with the Rocky, James Bond, Jurassic Park, Marvel
Cinematic Universe, DC Cinematic Universe, Harry Potter, Indiana Jones, Back to the Future, Terminator franchise,
even if you haven’t seen all the movies in the franchises. (I’ve been told to
avoid any Terminator movie made in the 21st century) If
you’re a girl you’ve probably seen all Disney princess movies a dozen times. Depending upon your age you may have watched all
of the Looney Tunes shorts from the 1940’s, 50’s & ‘60’s on TV along with
Tom & Jerry and other Tex Avery creations.
Still, I’m curious dear readers-if English teachers expose
students to various books/plays to provide them a well-rounded literature background,
what kind of movies should everyone know about so when I name drop Luke
Skywalker & Princess Leia everyone will immediately get what I am
saying? What are your random
thoughts?
No comments:
Post a Comment